———————————————————————–
CrystalDiskMark 5.1.2 x64 (C) 2007-2016 hiyohiyo
                           Crystal Dew World : http://crystalmark.info/
———————————————————————–
* MB/s = 1,000,000 bytes/s [SATA/600 = 600,000,000 bytes/s]
* KB = 1000 bytes, KiB = 1024 bytes

   Sequential Read (Q= 32,T= 1) :   172.172 MB/s
  Sequential Write (Q= 32,T= 1) :   116.388 MB/s
  Random Read 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) :    15.645 MB/s [  3819.6 IOPS]
Random Write 4KiB (Q= 32,T= 1) :     0.839 MB/s [   204.8 IOPS]
         Sequential Read (T= 1) :   171.754 MB/s
        Sequential Write (T= 1) :   100.032 MB/s
   Random Read 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) :    11.459 MB/s [  2797.6 IOPS]
  Random Write 4KiB (Q= 1,T= 1) :     0.791 MB/s [   193.1 IOPS]

  Test : 50 MiB [C: 25.1% (116.9/465.3 GiB)] (x2)  [Interval=5 sec]
  Date : 2016/02/15 15:19:01
    OS : Windows 10 Enterprise [10.0 Build 10586] (x64)
 

うーん。以前にThnkpad E450で計測したときとはまったく異なった値。CrystalDiskMarkの計測方法の問題なのかな。。。

投稿者 shimakawa